Thursday, April 18, 2013

Just a Couple of Idiots

From today's Lincoln Journal-Star:

Number 1.  Oscar Wilde Shad Chandler, convicted of having sex with a 14-year old girl, told the court at his sentencing hearing that "I have regrets over this whole thing." 

This was Shad's second sentencing hearing, the first having been continued after Shad ate a kleenex in court. As a precaution, the kleenex box was moved out of Shad's reach for the duration of the hearing

After hearing his client speak out loud, one can only imagine Shad's attorney (perhaps resting a gentle hand on Shad's shoulder, but  then again, maybe not, but definitely leaning in close), and whispering, "Hey, Shad, you really don't have to say anything. You can remain mute." But poor, dumb, sad Shad doesn't know what "mute" means, and anyways, he really just gots to get this thing off his chest. It's important, dammit. 

He shrugs his attorney's hand away defiantly and continues, clearing his throat and saying: "I just feel real bad about everything." The courtroom, despite the solemnity of the proceedings, erupts into howls of laughter, and Shad is led away in chains.

"I just feel real bad about everything."

BTW, "Shad"? Really? Did his parents want this to happen?


Number 2.  Carlene Schrag wrote the following in a letter to the editor:
"Stabbings on a college campus. Bombs in Boston. They are reminders that PEOPLE kill people."
So now we live in a world where death by anything other than gunshot is a cause to celebrate our lack of gun control laws. And she didn't even use the word "gun." She didn't have to. The terrorists gun lobbyists have won a complete and total victory.

 (BTW, Carlene, I would suggest either substituting "knives" for "stabbings" in the first incomplete sentence, or "bombings" for "bombs" in the second. I know, I know -- too late now. Just keep it mind the next time Wayne LaPierre that voice in your head tells you to write a letter to the editor.)

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Nebraska's Debtor's Prisons

Medieval British Debtor's Prison:


Modern American Debtor's Prison:


I imagine the conditions at the Lancaster County, Nebraska Detention Center are better than they were at St. Briavel's Castle in England (pictured above). The food is surely better (after all, St. Briavel's Castle is in England). There are surely fewer rats. And you don't generally have to stay very long in an American debtor's prison. Just until you can post bond or until the collections attorney who had you arrested gets around to conducting a debtor's exam. But I'm getting ahead of myself. First, a short primer on how this works.

Here's how to get sent to jail for owing money in Nebraska:

  • Apply for, and receive, a credit card.
  • Use the credit card, run it up to the limit, say $500.
  • Lose your job. 
  • The Credit Card company will start sending you letters, with an increasingly urgent tone and font-size, but will not take any legal action for at least 6 months, because that's about how long it takes for the "default interest rate" on the credit card (often more than 30% annually, compounded -- it's all in that tissue-thin piece of paper with the very tiny print that came with your card called "Cardmember Agreement" or the like, which of course you never read), to push the total dollar amount up to one that is worth suing over. 
  • Once that $500 hits $1500 or $2000 (or whatever this particular credit card company's "guidelines" specify), they will sue you. You may be served by a sheriff's deputy or a "constable" (who will probably just leave a note on your door and ask you to come down to the station house to pick up some papers, which you may or may not ever get around to doing. Or, you may be served by certified mail, or, (and this is a fairly recent development), UPS or FedEx. 
  • You blow it off. And don't tell me you won't, because I know you will. Okay, maybe not you, specifically. Maybe you're one of the one percent who files a written response to a credit card lawsuit, requiring them to get a summary judgment against you, rather than a judgment by default. But it really doesn't matter. They will beat you in the end.
  • After 30 days, the credit card company's lawyer will sign a large stack of affidavits, requesting judgments in dollar amounts the credit card company says it is owed. One of them will have your name on it. The attorney won't notice your name, because she does not actually read these affidavits, except to check for obvious computer-generated errors. One of her assistants will notarize them later and a "runner" will take them to the courthouse and have them filed.
  • A few days later, you'll get a postcard from the court. There won't be a picture on it, just a dollar-amount that will probably shock you.
  • Now the credit card company can garnish your wages, if you have any. Or your bank account, if you have one. They can take ("non-exempt") property from you and sell it. 
  • How do they know where you work, or where you bank? How do they find out what property you might have that they can take?
  • They schedule a debtor's examination. 
  • You are summoned by sheriff to appear in court on a certain date and at a certain time and to bring with you certain papers and be prepared to answer questions under oath. And if you fail to appear, a warrant will be issued for your arrest.
  • They can't be serious, right? You toss this paperwork with the rest and forget about. (Don't do this, by the way. It's a very bad idea.)
  • And a couple weeks later, you're driving home from a friend's house and you get pulled over for having a broken taillight. You'd been planning to get that fixed, just as soon as you got your next unemployment check, but that's not until Tuesday. You curse yourself silently, but figure, what the hell, you'll probably just get a warning, a "fix-it" ticket. And you'll definitely get that taillight fixed right away.
  • Instead, you are immediately arrested and taken straight to jail, because there is a warrant out for your arrest, and yes, they were serious.
  • So now you're in jail because you spent $500 on a credit card and couldn't pay it (and for being an idiot for not going to court when you were summoned to appear). Now you owe them over $2,000 and still can't pay it. And you're in jail. And you can't fucking believe this is happening. But it is. It is happening every single day to people just like you in Lincoln and Omaha (and elsewhere in the state, on a smaller scale).
  • You can't bond out, because you have no money, so you sit in jail until the next scheduled debtor's exam. (In Lincoln, they are every Friday morning at 8:30 in courtroom 21; in Omaha, they are every morning, except Thursdays, at 9:00 in courtroom 20.) 
  • So, depending on whether you were arrested in Lincoln or Omaha and on which day you were picked up, you will spend between one and six  nights in jail.
  • When the day of the examination hearing arrives, you are led, with the other debtors, in orange jumpsuits, your shackles linked together by a chain, into the courtroom, where an attractive young attorney goes from one of you to the next asking where you work and where you bank and whether you own or rent your home, and the whole thing takes no more than five minutes, and then you are "processed" and released.
You sign the paperwork acknowledging that your personal belongings weren't stolen from you while you sat in jail, which you're not really sure of because you don't remember what was in your pockets that night, but it's not like you'd make a stink about that even if something were missing. You get dressed and step outside and squint in the noonday sun, and think to yourself, "Well, at least I've got my freedom."

Except, not really. Because you still owe that credit company more than $2,000, and that pretty attorney lady? She can do this all over again tomorrow, and she will if the credit card company tells her to. Next time, though, you'll probably show up in court the first time. 

And that's how a credit card company can put a person in jail in Nebraska in 2013.

Monday, April 15, 2013

"Willful Cultural Ignorance"

This is the title of an article in today's AV Club (http://www.avclub.com/articles) Basically, their writers weigh in on various cultural phenomena that they have intentionally ignored for one reason or other (e.g., Harry Potter, Twilight, Charlie Sheen, etc.). Anyway, it's a fun article. You should read it.

But there are a few things that they failed to ignore, and I feel compelled to add to the list.

1. E.T. You know, that movie where that kid who looks sort of like "Mikey" from those 1970s Life Cereal commercials, who befriends a magical space alien with a flying bicycle, who at some point "phones home"? (Haha.) Yeah, I hate it. Don't get me wrong -- I've never seen it, and I never will, unless someday I find myself strapped to a chair with my eyes pried open, Clockwork Orange-style, and am forced to watch it as some kind of nightmarish "therapy" session. (I won't rule that out entirely, but it seems unlikely.) The first word that pops into my head when I think about this movie is "sentimental." Which, to me, is practically a synonym for "terrible."

2. Justin Bieber. I can tell you, honestly, that I have never heard a single song by this child. Ever. Now, I am definitely not one of those people who go around spouting off about how "life is precious," etc. Because it isn't. Life is common and messy and gross, and ultimately not really worth a damn. But still, there is only so much time. We just plain don't live very long. Fifty, sixty, seventy years ("three score and ten", blah blah blah). For virtually the entire history of the universe, we don't even exist. We are dead, most of the time. So, why, oh my God why, would anyone spend three minutes of this tiny allotment of time listening to this silly little boy sing one of his songs? There is no reason. You could spend that three minutes staring off into space. Or shitting. Or strangling a chicken. Whatever.

3. "Family Guy." I have never watched an entire episode of this show, which, I am told, is intended to be funny. It is not funny. I know this because I have seen previews for it. (Seriously, most of the time, you really can judge a book by its cover.) It is low-grade, moronic, "frat boy" humor ("OMG! His chin looks like testicles! Ha! Ha! Ha!"), and the animation is lousy. Just thinking about this awful show and its awful creator makes me sad. There are people who like this. There shouldn't be.

4. Twitter. Okay, I admit to having a twitter account, and I have used it. And about once every six months, I log in again, and try, again, to figure out what the fucking point of it is. Which is a huge hassle, because I've forgotten my password, again, or my username, or both, and they have to email it to me, and by the time I finally get logged in, I'm already irritated and bored. But I poke around anyway, and read some "tweets" and wonder, yet again, what the hell? Why does this exist.

5. Larry the Cable Guy. Do I really need to add anything here?

I could go on. And on, and on. I really have ignored many, many things. And will ignore many more things. I could write a highly uninformative book about all the things I ignore, but I probably won't quite get around to it. At least not anytime soon.




Thursday, April 4, 2013

"I have no stenographer!"

Owing to the lack of a stenographer, there will be no blog today or tomorrow probably goddamnit.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Restaurant Review: "The Road House Bar & Grill"


Disclaimer: I have never eaten at “The Road House Bar & Grill.”

We did not eat out last night. My wife made a delicious zucchini and pesto pizza, which was surely better than almost anything we could have ordered at a local restaurant. So, I am glad we did not go out for dinner. Even if we had, I’m sure we would not have chosen “The Road House Bar & Grill,” located at 1501 Centerpark Rd. First of all, I've never heard of Centerpark Rd., but it sure sounds far away. And second, “The Road House Bar & Grill”? Are you kidding me?

So, we did not arrive at the “Road House Bar & Grill” at around seven o’clock and we were not greeted by a hostess named Naomi, wearing a cowboy hat and boots and a skirt so short that my wife was scowling at me even before I noticed it. But, for the purposes of the rest of this review, let’s just say we did.

So, let’s just say that Naomi led us to our table and gave us our menus and told us that . . . Pamela would be our waitress tonight and she would be here shortly to take our drink orders. Sure enough, Pamela arrived promptly, also dressed in cowgirl-themed uniform, wearing a very tight western shirt that she apparently was unable to button all the way up, poor girl. We ordered our usual: “Two Bombay Sapphire martinis, very dry, gently shaken, one with an olive and one naked.”

“‘Naked’?” my wife said. “That’s a new touch.”

“Just trying it out,” I said. “What do you think?”

“I think I like it.”

Which would have been a nice moment to propose a toast and have a drink, but our drinks had not yet arrived. In the distance, over the country music on the jukebox, and the clacking of pool balls, I heard aggressive the shaking of a cocktail shaker, and cringed.

“What is it, Honey?”

“He’s shaking the shit out of those martinis, goddamn it. I did say ‘gently shaken,’ didn’t I?”

“Yes, you did. But don’t worry. everything will be fine.”

But sure enough, when Pamela returned, the drinks were cloudy. I didn’t say anything, though. No use getting started off on the wrong foot. I forced a smile as she set the drinks down. And then I tasted my drink. “Oh Good Lord!”

“Oh no,” said my wife, “They didn’t . . .”

“Oh, they did all right. Olive brine! Goddamn them!”

I took the drinks to the bar. The bartender, wearing a black hat and leather vest and a star-shaped name tag with “Josh” written in magic marker on it, said, “Can I help you?”

“I hope so,” I said. “It appears there has been a misunderstanding regarding our drinks.”

“What do you mean?”

“These . . . drinks. They have olive brine in them.”

Josh nodded and smiled. “Yep. Dirty Martinis. Just like you ordered.”

“I assure you, I did not order anything of the sort. In fact, you might notice that I ordered one of the martinis without olives at all . . .”

Josh found the order slip, looked at it, and then pounded the bar with fists that were much bigger than I'd originally noticed. “Goddamn that Pamela!”

“I’m sure it was just an honest mistake.”

“You have no idea,” he said, and unceremoniously dumped the drinks out. “I assure you, Sir, we will make this right for you.”

When Pamela brought our replacement drinks, her eyes were red and she was wiping tears from her face. “I hope these are okay,” she sniffled. They were not. Although unpolluted with olive brine, they were over-shaken, cloudy, icy, eventually watery.

By now, of course, no one was in the mood for dinner, but it came nonetheless. My steak was overcooked and chewy. My wife’s salmon looked fine from where I was sitting, but she did not comment on it. As we finished chewing and swallowing, a fight broke out over a pool game (or at least, near a pool table). Punches were thrown, pool cues and beer bottles were broken and used as weapons, the police were called. We passed on dessert, left too large a tip, and made it outside just as the police cruisers arrived.

Overall, I would give “The Road House Bar & Grill” a C-. Had I ever actually eaten there, I’m pretty sure I would not eat there again.

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Letters From Debtors

During my 15 years as a collections attorney, I received quite a few letters from people I sued. Surprisingly, they were not all angry and vicious, and I never got a single (specific enough to prosecute) death threat. Unfortunately, I did not save them all, but I did save enough to provide a picture, I think, of three basic types: the nice letters that thanked me for not being an asshole; the angry letters that, on the contrary, insisted that I was an asshole; and the crazy letters from crazy people.

[I am going to quote from some of these letters, but will, of course, not reveal the names of the people who wrote them.]

The "Nice" Letter

I met "Becky" (not her real name) at a garnishment hearing. I had gotten a default judgment against her and, following the usual "flow" of things, immediately garnished her bank account. She was living with her mother at the time, having just been released from the hospital where she'd been for the last month after attempting suicide. She was, as you might imagine, upset. The money in the bank account was all her mother's money. Becky didn't have a job and although she had applied for disability, she had not yet been approved for it. And, the money in the bank account -- her mother's money -- was all exempt from garnishment because her mother was on social security. We had the hearing, in the courtroom, before the judge, where she told the judge her story in between sniffs and sobs. I agreed to release the garnishment. (I was not doing any favors at this point -- the funds in the account were exempt and I had no right to keep them.)

After the hearing, we went out into the hall and talked. Becky had to sit down. She really didn't understand what had just happened. She cried, and God help me, I put my arm round her as she sobbed great big tears into my suit jacket. This is when she told me about the hospitalization and the suicide attempt, and about how she was living with her mom, and the collectors were calling every day, over and over again, and she felt horrible about it, because her mom was the one who answered the phone (she couldn't - it was too stressful for her).

And this was when I told her what I was going to do. "First, I'm going to remove your bank information from the file and replace it with a notice that the funds in the bank account are 'exempt.' Okay?"

She sniffled and said, "Okay."

"Nobody will be able to change that without my approval, and I will not give anybody that approval. Do you understand?"

"Yes." (Sniffle.)

"Next, I'm going to remove your phone number from our database, so that from now on, it will be impossible for our 'auto-dialer' to call your phone number. Okay?"

"Okay."

"And finally, I'm going to ask you to do something for me, okay?"

"Okay."

"I want you to go home and take a nap. And just take it easy for a few days. Don't think about me, or this lawsuit or anything related to it, okay?"

"Okay."

"You promise?"

She actually smiled and said, "I promise."

"Good. Now, when you are ready to start looking for a job, start looking for a job, and when you find one, I want you to call me. And when that happens, we will set up a payment plan so that I won't have to file a garnishment of your wages. Do you understand?" I gave her my business card. "Call me when you get a job. We'll set up a payment plan that you can afford. Until then, don't even think about me, okay?"

We both left the courthouse. I went back to my office and, I suppose, she went back to her mother's house and took a nap. Maybe a month or two later, I got a letter from her:

"Dear Mr. Wroblewski,
  You have been so kind in all you did to help me get this issue resolved. You may never know it but your kindness kept me alive that day."
It goes on, but you get the idea.

So, what happened to "Becky"? Well, she eventually did get a job, and when she did, she called me, and set up a payment arrangement, and she made all of her payments, finally paying off her judgment last December. She included her final check in a Christmas Card, which read:

"Thank you William for going above & beyond to help me! I sincerely hope you are valued & appreciated in all areas of your life! I hope 2013 is a blessed year filled with lots of friends!"

 The Crabby Old Man

My favorite crabby old man is "John Henry" (not his real name, and not a signor of the Declaration of Independence). He both wrote and called. We had a long and difficult relationship. The first time he called me, he complained about the "auto-dialer" and how whenever he answers it, it hangs up on him. "I have a heart condition," he said, "And this is driving me nuts!" Then, over the next year or so, he mailed small payments in ($25, $30, etc.), irregularly. He was probably not even keeping up with the interest on the debt.

At some point, we sent him an automated "settlement offer" letter, and he called to say that he was "very upset" about that, that he is on "SSI now and can't afford to pay another dime and to leave him the hell alone." [Note: this call was not made to me, but to a collector. I would surely have removed his phone number from the dialer upon receiving such a call.]

Despite his comments to the contrary, he keeps sending checks, for $25, not every month, but most months. Every once in a while, he forgets to sign the checks, so I have to send them back. After another year or two of this, he called and left a voice mail message (which I do not have unfortunately, but which I will paraphrase):

"I've been ending payments for the last six goddamn years and writing checks for five years and the last time I wrote you a check, I requested a payoff amount and didn't get it. I do not plan on paying this goddamn bill for the next 50 years and if you are not smart enough to get me that information, you are a very poor lawyer."
A few days later, I received a letter from him stating that "there is something wrong with your figures and I am taking my paperwork to the judge."

Soon after that, he called the collections line, spoke to a collector, who reported, "Debtor was mumbling words. Unable to understand. Hung up."

His next call, also to the collections line, is reported by the collector as follows: "Debtor called, talked about us asking him out on a date. I (the collector) asked what I could help him with and he said nothing. Said, 'Dirty Lawyers,' and hung up."

The second-last letter I received from him read: "I am a[n] Oklahoma Hellfighter. I am not a rich man.You are a dirty bill collector and very low. I do not have a computer. I can only send by mail and postal service. I have been paying on this bill to the crooked lawyers that can't make a living no other way. I have canceled checks for over 5 years and [the remainder is indecipherable]."

The last communication I received from him was an envelope addressed to me and filled with white powder. I opened it, a poof of white powder billowed from the envelope, and I called the police. The office was evacuated. Police, firemen, emergency workers, lab techs, etc., were dispatched to the office to analyze the contents of the envelope, which turned out to be flour. We closed his file.

And the Just Plain Crazy . . .

In response to a generic lawsuit on a credit card case, I received a "Motion to Dismiss" from a defendant whom I will call "Boris the Spider," for no particular reason. [Not his real name.]. I'm just going to go ahead and quote this at length, so bear with me:

"I motion the court to dismiss this untenable hence futile case for the following reasons:
  1.  I repudiate the inflated hence erroneous debt amount speciously presented by the stolid plaintiff.
  2. The Plaintiff was implacable and thus refused to accept my payments smaller than their inflexible standard. They vindictively turned my account over to the inexorable rapacity of  a collection agency.
  3.  I have fallen victim to the stagnated economy which has pervaded our entire nation and now defines this ominous epoch. Consequently, my financial status is now insolvent, and, unfortunately, I have been reduced to poverty. I have neither savings nor retirement or any such security to be examined, expropriated, let alone, to mitigate my penury. This is an irrefutably fact that can be substantiated by credible witnesses as well as government records.
  4. The alleged debt under consideration is deemed as [unsecured]. Furthermore, it accrued by the promiscuous spate of financial mergers endemic to banking and especially within this last unscrupulous, impetuous, and infamous decade. Therefore, this was the "risk factor" waged by the avarice of the Plaintiff.
  5. It is illogical  and unethical for the Plaintiff to capriciously offer a payoff discount of up to ninety percent, unsuccessfully, and, after wits, parlay the spurious amount to an arrant hence unreasonable sum. Such arbitrary latitude certainly calls into question their draconian conclusion as well as their misuse of the Court.
  6. It is impossible for me to satisfy moreover mitigate this insurmountable debt impugned against me by the Plaintiff. The future portends an even greater exiguity. 
  It would behoove the Court and, all involved, to dismiss the untenable case. Therefore, I motion to dismiss."

I have to admit, I find this Motion to be almost beautiful. Of course, I have no idea what he is talking about. He occasionally grazes important topics, but does not really understand then, or at the very least is unable to write about them in any meaningful way. And yet, you can't deny, he's interesting as hell. Did I get more correspondence from Boris the Spider? Yes, I did. Bonus coverage:

"I am in receipt of your letter dated [date]. Please take note that I have responded immediately to your inquiry. Thank you for extending another debt settlement offer. However,  my financial situation has worsened since our last written discourse. The pervasive effect of the the emaciated economy has left many casualties in the business world. The economic situation is growing critical and the future trajectory dismal at best. I regretfully inform you that I cannot satisfy this debt."

"I am in receipt of your court summons dated [date], and subsequent letter entitled: MAKE US AN OFFER, dated [date]. Please take note that I have responded immediately to your written inquiries and have invariably demonstrated probity and civil decorum in my written discourses in  response.
"Thank you for extending another debt settlement offer. However, my financial situation is dire and has continued to degenerate since our last written discourse. At this time, I do not have enough money for food. My parents have been feeding me. That is humiliating when you are 47 years of age but growing common. However, the baneful economic crisis has metastasized now nationwide. Our nation is embroiled in the great depression of the year 2010.
"Unfortunately, I cannot satisfy this debt moreover afford the option of making tenuous hence fleeting payments. Furthermore, the lawsuit you are attempting to impose against me is patently futile. I have no desirable assets. In fact, I have no retirement, savings, investments, in a word: nothing. My house is 100 years old, less than 800 square feet, has one bedroom, and no plumbing. In addition, the location of my property is deemed undesirable. My vehicles are antiquated and cannot pas standard emissions requirements; thus, they are undesirable and un-sellable. Everything I own is substandard. I am impecunious and live in poverty. Therefore, your efforts as a collections attorney to oppress, enslave, and thus torment, a hapless person, who living in abject poverty, is unquestionably draconian and aberrant to say the least.
"It is offensive to logic for you to invest more time and money pursuing a lost cause nevertheless burdening a court of law than what is literally owed as the debt, knowing that your untenable objective is impossible. Furthermore, the likelihood of a judge looking favorably upon your ignoble quest is imprudent.
"Sagaciously, I wish to quell any skepticism you may bear regarding my inauspicious circumstances. Unlike many of your defendants (debtors), I have never smoked, drank, drugged, gambled, whore mongered, and etcetera in my entire life. I have always worked hard and demonstrated probity, dependability, conservation, and spiritual beneficence. I am highly esteemed in my home town as a paragon citizen. I carry an unsullied police record. I am intelligent, talented, handsome, and sound of mind. I am in a constant state of advancing my education and thus the improvement of my being.
"However, time and chance happens to all, and none escape death. We are irrefutably living in perilous times. Therefore, take head that you, as a seasoned attorney, will be facing the same precarious circumstances in the near future. Thus, be admonished by the ominous presage looming on the horizon portend that your future will also suffer the same daunting fate.
"Until then, bode well my friend. The storm on the horizon is advancing exponentially."

I don't know about you, but I'd have to say that that's a pretty goddamn creepy letter. Not threatening, but creepy. And weird. And, of course, totally bat-shit loony.

I'm going to finish this with one more "nice" letter, so I can sleep tonight:

"Dear Mr.Wroblewski,
   Thank you for your kindness. I will send a $[xx] payment by the 15th of each month.
                                      Sincerely,
                                                Nice Lady

P.S. I don't care what people say about attorneys; I will be a passionate defender of your profession from here on out should a situation require it. :)" 


Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Some Things are Different and Some Things are the Same

It occurred to me today, while I was sitting around thinking about stuff, which I have plenty of time for these days, that it has been twenty years since I graduated from law school. (Not quite, really -- I think the graduation was in May or maybe June, but close enough, right?) And it occurred to me also just how much the world has changed over the course of these past twenty years. But also, how much it has remained the same. A few examples to illustrate:

  • President?

    • 1993: Clinton
    • 2013: Obama

  • Phone?

    • 1993: Hanging on my kitchen wall.
    • 2013: In my pocket.

  • Flying cars?

    • 1993: Nope.
    • 2013: No, but check out this awesome phone. Seriously.

  • Space Colonies?

    • 1993: Nope.
    • 2013: See above.

  • DFW?

    • 1993: IJ*
    • 2013: RIP

  • Age of the Earth?

    • 1993: Approximately 4,540,000,000 years old.
    • 2013: Approximately 4,540,000,020 years old.

  • Me?

    • 1993: 30 years old and looking for a job.
    • 2013: 50 years old and looking for a job.

  • Porn?

    • 1993: Dial-up.
    • 2013: Broadband.

  • World Trade Center?

    • 1993: Yes.
    • 2013: No.

  • "Mind if I smoke?"

    • 1993: "Not at all."
    • 2013: "Are you out of your mind?"

  • Streaming movies on Netflix?

    • 1993: Huh?
    • 2013: Of course!

  • "Trial of the Century"?

    • 1993: The People vs. O.J. Simpson.
    • 2013: Apple vs. Samsung.

  • Salmon Rushdie?

    • 1993: Fatwa still in effect.
    • 2013: With the publication of Joseph Anton: A Memoir, Rushdie somehow manages to make the Ayatollah a sympathetic character.

  • Best college football team?

    • 1993: Florida State
    • 2013: Sorry, I can't remember . . . . just really didn't pay much attention.

    Anyway, that's what I was thinking about. Probably ought to go wash dishes now or something.

    _______________________________
    * Yes, I realize Infinite Jest was published in 1996, but he was definitely working on it in '93. I mean, hell, it takes almost that long just to read the thing.